Alex Wilson Writer blank space
Alex Wilsonblank spaceAlex Wilson Comics
blank space Stories blank space Comics blank space Film blank space The Journal - Blog blank space Whereabouts blank space Abouts blank space Storeblank spaceActing
Newslettersblank spaceStore
Journal

(just the) "Michael Moore" Entries


Sicko and Other Media/Crit Fun
July 23, 2007

Congrats on the Congressional Gold, Norman Borlaug! But can we get a moratorium on press about Borlaug (scarce that it is) that begins with "it's a tragedy this guy doesn't get more press?" Because you know who's responsible for that sort of thing, right? It's like starting a sentence with "I'm not a jackass, but..."

Michael Moore's Sicko opened in wide release this weekend. Along with Breach, Zodiac, and The Lives of Others, it's among my favorite films of the year so far and I urge anyone and everyone to see it and talk about it--and to think about their own experience with health care in the U.S., and what they'd like it to be. Even if it's far from perfect--and not for the reasons critics keep saying--Sicko is an excellent starting point for the discussion we really need to have.

For disclosure: I've been a proponent of universal health care (or at least a hybrid between our system and universal, like what Costa Rica or Australia has) since before the first time my insurance provider declined to pay for my routine physical because it was "a preexisting condition" (what was? my body?). Jen works in health care and feels similarly, though we've decided to keep paying for insurance as long as we can afford it. It's a mixed bag, but in cases of expensive emergency it can be the difference between solvency and bankruptcy. And even a socialized-medicine-sympathizer like myself can think of times when health insurance actually came through for us.

I think the best and most informative analysis and extrapolation of Sicko and the subjects it brings up (a continuation of the discussion, if you will) has come from Jonathan Oberlander on Terry Gross's Fresh Air a few weeks back (MP3 podcast still available for at least a few more days here/direct MP3 download here). Among other things, he talks about the history of managed care, the way health insurance is already subsidized less-than-fairly in our country, and the employer-based universal coverage of Germany, which might be a more realistic goal for our system to aspire to, at least in the shorter term.

It's because I agree with so much of what Moore says in Sicko, that I wish the film was better. The mistake his documentaries repeatedly makes has little to do with any alleged inacuracies or his decision to put himself front-and-center as a lightning rod (though his name alone pursuades some people I know to avoid his work entirely). It's that he doesn't take opposing views seriously enough.

At its core, Sicko is predominantly anecdotal. Yes, I agree with Moore more often than not. But if I didn't, I could cherry-pick the horror stories from countries with universal health care and juxtapose them with the miracle-cure-caliber triumphs of HMOs in the U.S. when they actually come through for their customers. I could create a polar opposite documentary (though lack of skill and heart on my part wouldn't make it nearly as good). And if I'm not an artist, but just a regular member who hears/experiences/believes the other side's talking points, then I won't see those arguments addressed so much as ignored. And if examples that resemble my own anecdotes are omitted, then what reason would I have to trust that Moore's addressing the same reality I'm living in?

For example: If I go in believing that double-digit months for surgery was the rule in Canada and elsewhere, and Moore says "not true" and shows a few examples of short waits, I'll probably go away thinking Moore showed the exceptions not the rule. But what happens if Sicko acknowledges that, yes, these systems aren't perfect, and, yes, there can be long waits for non-life-or-death surgeries? And what if he compared that to the U.S. where wait time and access are not doled out based on need (life-threatening on one end, elective on the other) but doled out by providers based on what insurance plan you pay for, based on what you can afford?

THEN when the opponents of universal health care bring out THEIR anecdotal examples (or when audience members already know of situations which contradict what they see in the film), Sicko loses none of its thunder. It's a proven method of argument in the written world. If Moore's films are cinematic essays (and, yes, they belong in the nonfiction section), then there's no reason he shouldn't use all the tools at his disposal.

I've been a fan of Moore for years, so I think I understand why he does this: the mainstream media dismisses his views as fringe, so why should he give _their_ fringe views time when he's got the microphone? But I doubt a defense of there-are-fewer-problems-with-my-documentary-than-the-average-news-show-on-health-care variety is any better of a justification than it-was-quite-interesting-for-a-Michael-Bay-movie. Raise the bar, raise the debate, and bring a few more dissenters with you in the end.

But the thing I cringe the most about is the examples he shows of just _how_ comprehensively some of these governments can provide for their citizens. It makes for a great entertainment, and it's mind-blowing how little we expect from our government by comparison. And doctors making housecalls in the middle of the night is positively utopian (all repect to E.M.S. workers; we're talking about preventative medicine and non-emergency services). But government-subsidized vacation and the state sending a maid to your house to help with the laundry (and who, pray tells, comes to the maid's house to help with her chores?) is exactly the kind of future that opponents of universal health care are trying to scare their constituents with. Universal health care WON'T lead to the socialization of everyday life, but the fodder's there in Sicko for the taking.

I do hope I'm wrong. I was wrong in my impression of Farenheit 9/11. I thought it was Moore's weakest film to date, and by the end of it I was actually feeling sorry for our president, which is the effect that attack-ads always seem to have on me. But I know it changed some people's minds. And Sicko is Moore's most important documentary not because of the answers he gives, but because of the questions he asks. For that reason, I hope this is the beginning of the discussion and not the point where people tune it out.

Footnote: Okay, now let's say you hate Michael Moore and can't understand why I give props to the guy for anything he's done. You don't want your mind changed. You just want further evidence that Moore's a pussy. Go rent Haro Kazuo's mesmerizing 1988 documentary The Emperor's Naked Army Marches On. Came out just before Moore's Roger & Me and follows Japanese WWII veteran and activist Okuzaki Kenzo's attempts to interview his commanding officers and get them to confess their war crimes. It'll solidify your suspicions that Moore is a lightweight (at least compared to Okuzaki Kenzo), and that torture might actually be an effective method of interrogation outside the world of Jack Bauer. It certainly challenged my ideas about the world.

Pay no attention to the fact that Moore presented The Emperor's Naked Army Marches On at this year's Full Frame festival as one of the films that influenced him most.

(I'm remembering again why I don't discuss or review "peer and peerless" projects very often anymore; I'm a slow writer and giving them half the comprehensiveness they deserve takes waaaaay more time than I can afford to give my journal right now. Also: getting one of those "Alex Wilson" Google Alerts with my Transformers review saddled with a more important article by BuildingGreen President Alex Wilson... that puts things into perspective, don't it?)


Filed Under: Documentaries, Film, Health Care, Journal, Michael Moore, Norman Borlaug, Peers & Peerless, Reviews, Sicko, Universal Health Care, Well Awareness, World of Importance


Alex Wilson .com


Alex Wilson Writer

Alex Wilson writes fiction and comics in Carrboro, NC. His work has appeared/will appear in Asimov's Science Fiction, The Rambler, LCRW, Weird Tales, The Florida Review, Futurismic, ChiZine, Pif, and Dragon. Locus Magazine has called him a "promising new writer," and Publishers Weekly also has nice things to say.

Alex runs the audiobook project/podcast Telltale Weekly and the writer wiki Guidevines. He publishes the minicomic/zine Inconsequential Art. He is a 2006 Clarion graduate.



Blog Archives
2008 - Clever Label TBA
2007 - BadYearNoCookie
2006 - Clarion! 1st Pro Sale!
2005 - Peers and Peerless
2004 - Telltale Launch
2003 - Dog bites, acting out
2002 - In my mind, I'm going...
2001 - Marriage, Macs, 1st Cons
2000 - Setback, Milestones
1999 - Engaged, Graduated
1998 - Creative Independence


Guidevines for Writers
Alex Wilson Projects
Telltale Weekly
Alex Wilson Projects


Newsletter

This is an announcements-only list for Alex Wilson and his projects, with the occasional exclusive/freebie. Monthly at most, quarterly at least. Via Yahoo Groups


Powered by MT 3.35

MySpace Profile

Technorati Profile


Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam Alex Wilson, Revere
Alex Wilson, Ashland University
Alex Wilson .com

Thank you for dining with Alex Wilson Studios LLC.