![]() |
|
Back to Journal ![]() « Alex on Public Radio! | Rejectee/Rejector | Food Pyramids » Rejectee/Rejector March 20, 2004 (Selected republication of old entries from the pre-Movable Type journal...) Earlier this month a young writer with a bare website applied for the [now defunct] Procreatives link exchange program and, when membership wasn't approved, sent me an email to ask why, since she was a writer and thought her site was appropriate. "I'm constantly trying to improve my website," she wrote, "so your reason may help me out." The reason was because there just wasn't much on the site, which is one of the reasons listed as a likely reason for rejection. I wrote back: You are correct that, as a writer, your site is appropriate for the exchange in terms of subject. You are just limited in site content and bibliography. After you've had a few things published, please feel free to reapply.And since there was mention about an upcoming book to be published by a vanity press publisher known to prey on new writers, I expressed my concern and spent a few minutes digging up some links for her to read about the publisher. I then recommended that she visit Terry's and Vera's websites (two authors on the exchange), saying she could do worse than follow in their footsteps. There we go. Constructive criticism just as she asked for, right? Helping a young writer out, right? Well, obviously not.
Obviously I'm just some asshole who's jealous because this vanity press publisher I'm warning her about rejected me in the past or something. She defended her publisher and then wrote:
As for reapplying once I have a "few things publish" [sic], is also a slap in the face. It’s a once in a lifetime chance to get published at all by a traditional publisher, and you minimalizing that is just insulting. No, I won't be reapplying.I sent her a note back (I picture you editors shaking your heads mumbling, "You poor, doomed fool...") trying to clarify that the vanity press had no bearing on her membership consideration--it just wasn't going to be the sole reason for publication when it wasn't even out yet and there was nothing else by which to consider her site. But I don't expect to hear from her again. I don't regret not approving her membership, but I thought about her reaction and I wondered how many new writers don't want to hear how hard it is in the publishing world. One of the judges of "American Idol/Star Search" or some similar show was on The Daily Show (which, along with The Sopranos completes my justification for cable) a while back and Jon Stewart asked him how many of the kids rejected for the talent search thought the judges were obviously blind to their talent and felt they were unjust in rejecting them. "All of them," the judge said. Stuff like this makes me more appreciate the editors who reject me. If they don't comment on my manuscripts, I now know that it's about more than just time and energy. It's because, even when we ask for constructive criticism, we're not always receptive to it. At any rate, I received a letter from Writers of the Future this week. Said my entry in December placed in the quarter finals for that quarter. What wasn't exactly clear by the letter was whether that meant "You are a finalist and we’ll let you know what happens when the judging is over" or "you were a finalist, but it’s all over. Attaboy anyway." I guessed the latter but had to get confirmation from some friends online--I didn't want to submit the story elsewhere before before I knew for sure. In spite of my initial confusion, it was a nice way to hear that I was rejected--that I was a quarterfinalist. From now on I'll try to be that gentle. But not that specific and maybe a little less constructive. Filed under Journal, Prose and Poetry, Writers of the Future
Comments: Discuss this entry at LiveJournal |
|
Alex Wilson writes fiction and comics in Carrboro, NC. His work has appeared/will appear in Asimov's Science Fiction, The Rambler, Weird Tales, The Florida Review, Futurismic, Shimmer, ChiZine, FutureQuake, Pif, and Dragon. Locus Magazine has called him a "promising new writer," and Publishers Weekly also has nice things to say. Alex runs the audiobook project/podcast Telltale Weekly and the writer wiki Guidevines. He publishes the minicomic/zine Inconsequential Art. He is a 2006 Clarion graduate.
Latest Blogs
My Brain Is Your Stock Market "Dry Frugal with Death Rays," now at Futurismic Klean Kanteen FTW: Nalgene No More Telltale Audio - July 2008 Latest Audiobooks The Story of the Inexperienced Ghost Tales of the Elephant An Encounter with an Interviewer Bulfinch's Mythology: The Age of Fable 03: Apollo and Daphne, Etc Latest Guidevines Apex Digest Apex Digest Podcastle Con Anti-Harassment Project Clarion Submission Log Prose and Poetry Comic Stripping Audio Projects Carrboro NC Area Kittens/Cats Pretty Pictures Acting Peers & Peerless World of Importance Vanity Smurf Blog Archives 2008 - Clever Label TBA 2007 - BadYearNoCookie 2006 - Clarion! 1st Pro Sale! 2005 - Peers and Peerless 2004 - Telltale Launch 2003 - Dog bites, acting out 2002 - In my mind, I'm going... 2001 - Marriage, Macs, 1st Cons 2000 - Setback, Milestones 1999 - Engaged, Graduated 1998 - Creative Independence
Latest Blogs
My Brain Is Your Stock Market "Dry Frugal with Death Rays," now at Futurismic Klean Kanteen FTW: Nalgene No More Latest Audiobooks The Star New Testament: Philippians Sherlock Holmes: The Adventure of the Six Napoleons Powered by MT 3.35 MySpace Profile |
![]() |