Clarion Epilogue: Revisionist His Story
September 1, 2006

On a generous day, Swanwick might say the above title is a "nice try."

So I'm doing an overhaulish revision on another one of my Clarion stories. It's one of the pieces Michael Swanwick had major issues with, and he was kind enough to do line edits on it anyway. Since my target market for the story is probably Analog, Swanwick's critique was proabably the single-most-valuable marked-up manuscript I would take home with me. So why I sent it home via UPS rather than tape it to my chest for the flight home is a mystery. Okay, it's because I'm hairy and because it would hurt and because today I'm prone to hyperbole, but still.

I sent two boxes home via UPS. The larger of the boxes fell apart in transit, and I counted myself as fortunate that the box arrived with anything still in it. I could have lost a good hundred dollars worth of books there. And today (after a lot of searching/double-checking) I'm accepting that my Swanwick folder was included in the stuff that never made it from Michigan to North Carolina. Crap. Crap. Crap.

So I've gone through my notes, the critiques of my classmates, and those of the later instructors who also went through the story. Almost everybody (including me) agreed with two or three major flaws in the draft I turned in, and I've been working on ways to make the story work ever since. But it wasn't until this week that I figured out a way to (hopefully) address the last of the big problems. Don't know whether that's the cause or effect of my getting interested, even excited, about prose again, four weeks after Clarion's end.

Doesn't mean it's easy. But at this point, I'm confident I can figure out how to turn four out of my six Clarion stories into working, submittable pieces of fiction, if I can push myself enough. I'll try to fix the other two as well, if only to honor the time and work 20+ people put into helping me see what's wrong with them. And then my biggest problem will be figuring out when it's safe to toss the critiques that didn't get lost in transit. Maybe when the story sells? I'm such a packrat sometimes that shipping things to myself via UPS is probably the most reliable way for me to get rid of crap.

As for addressing how Swanwick suggested I fix what's fixable in this particular story... I don't know what I can trust because they're all suspect: the quality of my notes, the quality of my handwriting creating an obstacle between me and my notes, or the quality of my memory. As Swanwick might say... well, if I knew what Swanwick said, I wouldn't be so pissed about losing that line-edit. There's that and also this was a story Swanwick didn't think was fixable, and he put so much work into critiquing it anyway just to help teach me how to write. Maybe I'll look for that folder one more time.

Filed under Clarion, Journal, Prose and Poetry
Alex Wilson .com

Add to Technorati Favorites Comments: Discuss this entry at LiveJournal

Why don't you email him and ask for his help?

Posted by: steve at September 1, 2006 10:13 PM


Dividing Comments Rule

Oh, crap. Sorry about the mishap with UPS. I didn't want to trust something invaluable like my crits to the ravages of the US Postal Service or UPS, so I bought an extra bag just for books and manuscripts to carry onto the plane with me. I hope that folder turns up--Swanwick's line edits and critiques are gold.

Posted by: Eugene at September 1, 2006 11:18 PM


Dividing Comments Rule

(a) Swanwick's line-edits are dramatic, and they're fantastic for dissecting your own writing and learning from that, but in terms of shaping up a story for publishing, there's so much stripping that you've got nothing left by the end, so you might actually be better off without them.

(b) The ____ story was excellent, and I got the impression Swanwick was giving you big compliments: that you're already a writer and that every other aspect of the story is successfully in place, so it's too bad about the fatal flaw. But just because he couldn't think of a solution doesn't mean there isn't one, and it sounds like you made it work. Excited to find out what you've done to it!

(c) Yeah, your handwriting, man.

Posted by: Felice at September 2, 2006 1:24 AM


Dividing Comments Rule

Steve: I'm far enough along in the revision that the line edits aren't going to help this particular story anymore. At this point, I would agree with what Felice said, I would want them more to look at patterns in my writing style and ways to make my prose more appropriate for Swanwick-friendly markets. I think I've got enough from my notes to address (or not) the big issues he had with it. And my social anxiety already makes it difficult to ask for help. That I already feel bad that he had to trudge through the story once makes this one a non-option.

Eugene: Thanks, yeah. I don't know what I was thinking.

Felice: (a) I don't know about better off without them, but, yeah, at this point they're not going to help this particular story so much as help me get better at cutting/improving everything. (b) Thanks. (c) Yeah, but it comes in handy in case my roommate wants to read my diary.

Posted by: Alex at September 2, 2006 8:11 AM


Dividing Comments Rule

I finally remember this story. But what was that fatal flaw again? Oh yeah. To be honest, that flaw never seemed that fatal to me. It could easily be explained away with a line or a paragraph of dialogue.

Posted by: Rahkan at September 2, 2006 11:47 AM


Dividing Comments Rule

Thanks, Rahul. Yeah, Swanwick's take on the story differs from mine as well, and I think it's indicative how the SF element of an SF story is usually the least interesting thing to me about it. I've significantly changed the story from that standpoint, but the more difficult issue (to me) was one of those internal-consistency issues that (in my view) no amount of hand-waving can justify.

Back to work.

Posted by: Alex at September 3, 2006 11:20 AM


Dividing Comments Rule

by Alex Wilson. This is from an online journal/blog I kept from 1998-2009. Back to alexwilson.com.